摘 要:對(duì)比分析了組合法與復(fù)合法的原理,揭示出兩種方法存在著本質(zhì)上的區(qū)別。本文分別采用了組合法和復(fù)合法,并基于三種邊界條件分解方法針對(duì)含MSD結(jié)構(gòu)的應(yīng)力強(qiáng)度因子計(jì)算,基于FRANC2D的計(jì)算結(jié)果進(jìn)行比對(duì),給出了計(jì)算MSD裂紋應(yīng)力強(qiáng)度因子更為準(zhǔn)確的方法。
關(guān)鍵詞:多位置損傷; 應(yīng)力強(qiáng)度因子; 組合法; 復(fù)合法
Abstract: Compare and analyze the principle of the combination method and composite method, reveal that these two methods exist material difference. We use combination method and composite method respectively in this paper, and calculate the stress intensity factor of MSD structure based on three kinds of decomposition methods of the boundary conditions, and compared with the calculation results based on FRANC2D. At last, provide a more accurate method to calculate the stress intensity factor of MSD crack.
Key words: MSD; Stress intensity factor; Combination method; Composite method
聯(lián)系方式
楊亞寧:597049275@qq.com
責(zé)任編輯:趙澤南
《中國(guó)腐蝕與防護(hù)網(wǎng)電子月刊》征訂啟事
投稿聯(lián)系:劉娟 電話:010-82387968-807
QQ: 2850329508 郵箱:liujuan@ecorr.org
中國(guó)腐蝕與防護(hù)網(wǎng)官方 QQ群:140808414
-
標(biāo)簽: 多位置損傷, 應(yīng)力強(qiáng)度因子, 組合法, 復(fù)合法
官方微信
《中國(guó)腐蝕與防護(hù)網(wǎng)電子期刊》征訂啟事
- 投稿聯(lián)系:編輯部
- 電話:010-62313558-806
- 郵箱:fsfhzy666@163.com
- 中國(guó)腐蝕與防護(hù)網(wǎng)官方QQ群:140808414


